Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add EIP: Fork-choice enforced Inclusion Lists (FOCIL) #9010

Open
wants to merge 99 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

soispoke
Copy link

@soispoke soispoke commented Nov 1, 2024

This EIP proposes a committee-based, Fork-choice enforced Inclusion Lists (FOCIL) mechanism to preserve Ethereum’s censorship resistance properties by guaranteeing timely transaction inclusion.

soispoke and others added 30 commits July 17, 2024 10:48
main functions and core properties
Updated the Agg, Eval and Valid functions
Update main FOCIL functions: Agg, Eval and Valid
Change local ILs to include full transactions instead of a tx summary
Co-authored-by: JihoonSong <jihoonsong@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: JihoonSong <jihoonsong@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: JihoonSong <jihoonsong@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot added c-new Creates a brand new proposal s-draft This EIP is a Draft t-core labels Nov 1, 2024
@eth-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eth-bot commented Nov 1, 2024

File EIPS/eip-FOCIL.md

Requires 1 more reviewers from @axic, @g11tech, @gcolvin, @lightclient, @SamWilsn, @xinbenlv

File EIPS/eip-7805.md

Requires 1 more reviewers from @axic, @g11tech, @gcolvin, @lightclient, @SamWilsn

@eth-bot eth-bot added e-consensus Waiting on editor consensus e-review Waiting on editor to review labels Nov 1, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-ci Waiting on CI to pass label Nov 1, 2024
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
---
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
---
---
eip: 7805

Assigning next sequential EIP/ERC/RIP number.

Please also update the filename.

description: Allow a committee of validators to force-include a set of transactions in every block
author: Thomas Thiery <thomas.thiery@ethereum.org>, Francesco D'Amato <francesco.damato@ethereum.org>, Julian Ma <julian.ma@ethereum.org>, Barnabé Monnot <barnabe.monnot@ethereum.org>, Terence Tsao <ttsao@offchainlabs.com>, Jacob Kaufmann <jacob.kaufmann@ethereum.org>, Jihoon Song <jihoonsong.dev@gmail.com>

discussions-to: <URL>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please create a discussions topic in Eth Magicians using the template: https://ethereum-magicians.org/c/eips/5

soispoke and others added 3 commits November 2, 2024 07:39
Co-authored-by: Andrew B Coathup <28278242+abcoathup@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot added w-ci Waiting on CI to pass and removed w-ci Waiting on CI to pass labels Nov 4, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the w-ci Waiting on CI to pass label Nov 4, 2024
@eth-bot eth-bot changed the title Add EIP: Committee-based, Fork-choice enforced Inclusion Lists (FOCIL) Add EIP: Fork-choice enforced Inclusion Lists (FOCIL) Nov 4, 2024
@soispoke
Copy link
Author

soispoke commented Nov 4, 2024

@abcoathup Thanks for reviewing, looks like all checks are passing now :)

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2024

The commit 30f5345 (as a parent of 3f265bf) contains errors.
Please inspect the Run Summary for details.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-ci Waiting on CI to pass label Nov 4, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the w-ci Waiting on CI to pass label Nov 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c-new Creates a brand new proposal e-consensus Waiting on editor consensus e-review Waiting on editor to review s-draft This EIP is a Draft t-core
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants